For those who refuse to examine vaccine science with the due diligence that children deserve… here’s a not so little infographic that might help you to understand the complexity and depth of the problem that you are ignoring.
If you’re interested in the full body of research after examining this, I can hook you up. Just let me know. Truth is there, but you have to prioritize truth and health over social and societal acceptance. If you want to know what many of us already know, you also have to read thousands of pages of science that is locked up behind pay walls thousand of dollars high. So, if you can’t afford it, I can help you. However, if you won’t invest the time in it, you don’t get to threaten me with the ignorant nonsense that you gleaned from an episode of Jimmy Kimmel or Penn and Teller.
A few months ago, I sat in a room at UC Berkeley and listened to a bunch of ‘progressive’ vaccine zealots laugh, mock, and ridicule the suffering of African American families affected by autism as they celebrated the passage of SB277 in California.
They literally didn’t even bother to evaluate the merits of Dr. William Thompson’s whistle blower statement or the content of his recorded conversations with Dr. Brian Hooker. A senior scientist at CDC (and co-author on one of the most widely referenced studies concluding ‘no autism-vaccine link’) came forward and said, ‘we omitted statistically significant data’, ‘I have great shame’, and ‘I can’t believe what we did’.
After seeing the way in which students at UC Berkeley apathetically observed the blatant censorship at Paul Offit’s appearance on campus yesterday, I believe we have begun to see the plans and predictions of the past generation’s elitist, atheist, technocratic, social-engineers come to fruition.
When I consider how hopelessly manipulated, docile, poisoned, and passive, those young people (only a decade behind me) have already become, I imagine a terribly enslaved world for the children of my own child’s generation, who are being subjected to an even greater burden of forced injections and liberty despising statist indoctrination.
So if you know ANYTHING at all about vaccine science, you know that there has NEVER been a study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated. The argument from the medical profession and the vaccine industry is that it would be unethical to conduct a prospective study in which a control group of children are denied vaccines.
Here’s what they don’t want to talk about:
A retrospective study would be easy to do and if vaccinated children are SO MUCH healthier, then conducting retrospective studies of vaccinated versus unvaccinated health outcomes should be a huge testament to the health promoting power of vaccines. If unvaccinated children are being raised by parents who are medically negligent, their children should be much less healthy, right?
California’s vaccine mandate, SB277, effectively says, “Take the fetus in your body or no education for you!” In fact, if you don’t put these fetus giblets in your children the state may even investigate and snatch your kids because clearly only a negligent ‘religious extremist’ would gladly choose chickenpox over participating in this disgusting practice.
California has mandated desecration and a bunch of twisted, ignorant, cowardly, and complacent fools have given their consent and are allowing it to continue. Shame on all those who have kept silent. Will those responsible for this deception escape the wrath of God?
People are violently angry at “anti-vaxxers” because we won’t get with the program and endorse this filthy satanic practice. So be it. To coerce and force this on people and punish and harass them for having ethical, philosophical, religious, and medical objections is so violent and dangerous.
You don’t want to repeatedly inject your children with cloned bits of others’ slaughtered babies? Fine. Your kids can’t be educated in our indoctrination centers.
That’s ugly but it’s not the whole truth because they’ve also taken away private school. So, if you choose to pass on the fancy fetus fest, your child is restricted to home school only. That’s where we live now… in Cali-fascist-fornia!
So, I’ve been following this for a while now. This article, The Vaccination Double Standard, is exactly the type of fascist rhetoric that triggers me. Reading this underscores the ignorance and negligence of my family and friends who refuse to seriously examine and question the safety of vaccines and who are allowing mandates to proceed.
The vaccine zealots know they can’t allow our exceptionally healthy unvaccinated kids to exist any longer. The pressure is mounting to finally perform controlled studies of vaccinated versus unvaccinated and to clean house at the CDC. So they’re trying to astroturf support to Semmelweis us. If this sort of dangerous rhetoric becomes action, it will certainly end in bloodshed and tragedy.
So if any ‘pro vaxxers’ are listening, ask yourself, “which vaccines are so critical and so safe that they should be made mandatory?” Have you thought it through that far? Can you even name half of the bloated ‘recommended’ list? Do you get your experimental flu shot every year? The propagandists don’t ever provide specifics in this area. They simply appeal to a ‘general consensus’ and an exhaustive body of ‘settled science’. Is this because they’ve examined the scientific literature and polled the scientists? No, it’s because they are thoughtless mercenaries and useful idiots promoting the agenda of a very powerful industry in a tragically broken paradigm.
For anyone out there who is firmly convinced that the inhuman philosophy and practice of eugenics has been long abandoned, please consider the following. A) The United States was the first country to concertedly undertake compulsory sterilization programs for the purpose of eugenics:
E) Maybe we should not authorize corporations (especially those which have been deeply entrenched in the history of eugenics) the power to inject whatever they decide to put in vaccines into ourselves and our children.
Naw, it’s probably cool. They tested these vaccines to make sure they weren’t causing infertility, cancer, and genetic mutation, right? Actually, no.
Imagine invading the uterus to impale, crush, extract, and dissect the flesh of a human child 3 months after conception. Then clone the viable lung tissue and culture measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine on this human flesh before shooting it into the bodies of the entire population without even testing for mutagenic potential. A genetic epidemic isn’t possible without a massive genetic alteration. Someone pointed out that the second X (the red one) in the Vaxxed documentary title image sequence may be a deliberate reference to mutagenesis.
Perhaps we are unconsciously carrying out a massive eugenics campaign in which those who succumb to death and neurological damage from vaccine injury are prevented from passing their genes to the next generation. Will this eventually result in the end of vaccine injury as the most efficient and ideal vaccine subject is bred? Is this why the Institute of Medicine (IOM) has specifically discouraged and rejected scientific inquiry which would seek to personalize medicine by identifying those at risk for severe and irreversible injury and death as a result of vaccination?
Informed individuals are rightfully distrustful of corporations like Merck and Monsanto and governmental agencies like the FDA and CDC. We’ve seen repeated and irrefutable evidence of blatant complicity and corruption at the highest administrative levels of each.
Observational-Scientific exploration of published academic literature verifies that the potentially harmful human health effects of our most ubiquitous consumables and injectables are given very little consideration and there appears to be an uncomfortable absence of controlled longitudinal safety studies.
Historical-Contextual understanding of these agencies and corporate entities reveals them to be perpetual agents of profiteering and misguided utilitarianism, and in some cases, eugenics. It confirms the financial ease and methodical craftiness with which multi-national and global corporations assert influence over states, nations and continents.
Much of the literature declaring health and food products to be ‘safe’ and/or ‘effective’ is written by researchers working in programs which receive the most charitable contributions from the corporate coffers of the products’ producers. Conventional pharmaceutical and agricultural products contain elements which have a well documented biological plausibility and demonstrated history of adverse health outcomes upon concentrated and direct exposure.
The observable deterioration of the general health of the society and knowledge gained through personal experiment, witness, and testimony all point to the disturbing possibility that we have introduced a myriad of harmful environmental toxins into our bodies which are impeding our health. I would like to hear the public health community comment more frequently on the explosion of autoimmune disease, attention deficit disorder, severe food allergies and ‘autism-like’ features of neurological impairment, instead of seeking to normalize these increasingly pervasive maladies.
The destruction of human health brought on by the use of inadequately tested biologics and agricultural chemicals is a very real and likely possibility. A thorough examination of volumes of published scientific research literature and hundreds of hours of expert testimony raises considerable questions as to the safety of present practices.
“Use emotional warfare on anti-vax blogs. Tell emotional stories full of tears and sobbing and unbearable grief and terror, about people in your own family or people you read about, who were sick with or died of terrible diseases. Don’t hold back details about bodily fluids and suchlike: the more gross the better. This stuff has a way of infiltrating the minds of readers and subtly influencing their decisions, in a manner similar to advertising.”
“Go in there and ‘agree with them’ and then say things that appear thoroughly delusional, overtly nuts, blatantly and obviously wrong even to nincompoops, etc. Occasional spelling and grammar errors are also useful but don’t over-do. The point of this exercise is to create an impression that drives away undecideds who may come in to check out these sites. It helps to do this as a group effort and begin gradually, so the sites appear to be ‘going downhill slowly.’”
“But it is useful to have an email address that can’t be traced back, for certain legitimate and ethical uses, just as it is useful to have a mail box at say the UPS store.”
ORAC’s writing is so prolific that it’s hard to imagine him having any time to perform the functions of a surgeon. I guarantee you that many intelligent parents looking for answers stumble upon the vitriol this man spews and even cite it as ‘legitimate’ and ‘rational’ evidence that vaccines are safe and effective.
I had a ‘soylent green is people‘ moment when I realized that the whole society is absolutely comfortable with chopping up fetuses, cloning them, and pumping them into the arms and legs of ourselves and our newborn babies in order to ‘stay healthy’.
Fascist vaccine zealots looking to enact laws requiring vaccination for participation in society are perpetually invoking the ‘car seat’ analogy in order to diminish and trivialize the significant ethical concerns of vaccine derivation methods. Well let’s run with that.
Imagine the manufacturer of a car seat made of cloned slaughtered fetuses purporting that skinned and tanned baby hide is tougher than leather and softer than polyester! Plus they keep you extra safe because they know what it’s like to suffer a violent death. Who knowingly buys that product, forces others to use it, or sits back while it’s forced on their friends and family?
I reject that twisted utilitarian disregard for human life. Nothing good can come from it. So it’s no surprise to me that among the suppressed scientific literature is a large body of very legitimate research demonstrating correlation as well as biological plausibility and evidence of unethically derived vaccine components causing harmful human health effects.